Background Diagram: Mountian-Sky-Astronomy-Big-Bang blog.For this year's Darwin Day post, I would like to introduce the concept of Universal Darwinism. To understand what is meant by universal Darwinism, we need to explore the meaning of the term as well as the many instances Darwinian ideas have been applied to. The most straightforward definition of Universal Darwinism is a Darwinian processes that can be extended to any adaptive system, regardless of their suitability. Darwinian processes can be boiled down to three essential features:
1) production of random diversity/variation (or stochastic process).
2) replication and heredity (reproduction, historical contingency).
3) natural selection (selective mechanism based on some criterion).A fourth feature, one that underlies all three of these points, is the production and maintenance of populations (e.g. population dynamics). These features are a starting point for many applications of universal Darwinism. Depending on the context of the application,these four features may be emphasized in different ways or additional features may be added.
Taken collectively, these three features constitute many different types of process, encompassing evolutionary epistemology  to cultural systems , neural systems [3, 4], physical systems [5, 6], and informational/cybernetic systems [7, 8]. Many of these universal applications are explicitly selectionist, and do not have uniform fitness criteria. In fact, fitness is assumed in the adaptive mechanism. This provides a very loose analogy to organismal evolution indeed.
Universal computational model shaped by Darwinian processes. COURTESY: Dana Edwards, Universal Darwinism and Cyberspace.Of these, the application to cybernetic systems is the most general. Taking inspiration from both cybernetics theory and the selectionist aspects of Darwinian models, Universal Selection Theory [7, 8] has four basic claims that can be paraphrased in the following three statements:
1) "operate on blindly-generated variation with selective retention".
2) "process itself reveals information about the environment".
3) "processes built atop selection also operate on variation with selective retention".The key notions are that evolution acts to randomly generate variation, retains only the most fit solutions, then builds upon this in a modular and hierarchical manner. In this way, universal Darwinian processes act to build complexity. As with the initial list of features, the formation and maintenance of populations is an important bootstrapping and feedback mechanism. Populations and heredity underlie all Darwinian processes, even if they are not defined in the same manner as biological populations. Therefore, all applications of Darwinian principles must at least provide an analogue to dynamic populations, even at a superficial level.
There is an additional advantage of using universal Darwinian models: capturing the essence of Darwinian processes in a statistical model. Commonalities between Darwinian processes and Bayesian inference [3, 5] can be proposed as a mechanism for change in models of cosmic evolution. In the Darwinian-Bayesian comparison, heredity and selection are approximated using the relationship between statistical priors and empirical observation. The theoretical and conceptual connections between phylogeny, populations, and Bayesian priors is a post-worthy topic in and of itself.
At this point, we can step out a bit and discuss the origins of universal Darwinian systems. The origin of a Darwinian (or evolutionary) system can take a number of forms . There are two forms of "being from nothingness" in  that could be proposed as origin points for Darwinian systems. The first is an origin in the lowest possible energetic (or in our case also fitness) state, and the other is what exists when you remove the governance of natural laws. While the former is easily modeled using variations of the NK model (which can be generalized across different types of systems), the latter is more interesting and is potentially even more universal.
An iconic diagram of Cosmic Evolution. COURTESY: Inflation Theory by Dr. Alan Guth.
An iconic diagram of Biological Evolution. COURTESY: Palaeontological Scientific Trust (PAST).
So did Darwin essentially construct a "theory of everything" over 200 years ago? Did he find "42" in the Galapagos while observing finches and tortoises? There are a number of features from complexity theory that might also fit into the schema of Darwinian models. These include concepts from self-organization not explicitly part of the Darwinian formulation: scaling and complexity, dependence on initial condition, tradeoffs between exploitation and exploration, and order arising from local interactions in a disordered system. More explicitly, contributions from chaos theory might provide a bridge between nonlinear adaptive mechanisms and natural selection.
The final relationship I would like to touch on here is a comparison between Darwinian processes and Universality in complex systems. The simplest definition of Universality states that the properties of a system are independent of the dynamical details and behavior of the system. Universal properties such as scale-free behavior  and conformation to a power law  occur in a wide range of systems, from biological to physical and from behavioral to social systems. Much like applications of Universal Darwinism, Universality allows us to observe commonalities among entities as diverse as human cultures, organismal orders/genera, and galaxies/universes. The link to Universality also provides a basis for the abstraction of a system's Darwinian properties. This is the key to developing more representationally-complete computational models.
8-bit Darwin. COURTESY: Diego Sanches.
Darwin viewed his theory development of evolution by natural selection as an exercise in inductive empiricism . Ironically, people are now using his purely observational exercise as inspiration for theoretical mechanisms for systems from the natural world and beyond.
 Radnitzky, G., Bartley, W.W., and Popper, K. (1993). Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. Open Court Publishing, Chicago. AND Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Simon and Schuster, New York.
 Claidiere, N., Scott-Phillips, T.C., and Sperber, D. (2014). How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 36(9), 20130368.
 Friston, K. (2007). Free Energy and the Brain. Synthese, 159, 417-458.
 Edelman, G.M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: the theory of neuronal group selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
 Campbell, J. (2011). Universal Darwinism: the path to knowledge. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
 Smolin, L. (1992). Did the universe evolve? Classical and Quantum Gravity, 9, 173-191.
 Campbell, D.T. (1974). Unjustified Variation and Selective Retention in Scientific Discovery. In "Studies in the Philosophy of Biology", F.J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky eds., pgs. 139-161. Palgrave, London.
 Cziko, G.A. (2001). Universal Selection Theory and the complementarity of different types of blind variation and selective retention. In "Selection Theory and Social Construction", C. Hayes and D. Hull eds. Chapter 2. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
 Siegal, E. (2018). The Four Scientific Meanings Of ‘Nothing’. Starts with a Bang! blog, February 7.
 Barabási, A-L. (2009). Scale-Free Networks: a decade and beyond. Science, 325, 412-413.
 Lorimer, T., Gomez, F., and Stoop, R. (2015). Two universal physical principles shape the power-law statistics of real-world networks. Scientific Reports, 5, 12353.